Produire l’inconnu. L’intelligence artificielle au prisme des ambivalences du rationalisme leibnizien

CONTRIBUTI / 3 / François Levin /

DOI


Producing the unknown. Artificial intelligence in the light of the ambivalences of Leibnizian rationalism 

This article is born from an astonishment: that aroused by the reading of Leibniz. It was expected to find traces of an absolute rationalism, oriented towards the reduction of everything to the known as well as towards the increase of control of the world by the knowing subject. On the contrary, we discover deep ambivalences, especially in his major project of constituting an art of invention (ars inveniendi): it is a profoundly baroque logical project, oriented by the desire to produce novelty and which leads to a form of dispossession of the subject. We can produce, from this astonishment, another genealogy of artificial intelligence, which allows us to understand its current creative developments. It also helps us to grasp how it is characteristic of an unconscious form of metaphysics of the modern era, which places its search for otherness inside machines. 

Download


Bibliographie 

Sources primaires 

  • Heidegger, M., 2003, Le Principe de raison, Paris, Gallimard. 
  • Leibniz, G.-W., 1954, Opuscules philosophiques, Paris, Hatier-Boivin. 
  • Deleuze, G., 1988, Le Pli, Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit. 
  • Amoore, L., 2013, The Politics of Possibility, Durham, Duke University Press. 
  • Elgammal, A., Bingchen, L., Elhoseiny, M., Mazzone, M., CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks Generating “Art” by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms, arXiv:1706.07068. 
  • Bates, D., 2021, L’IA peut-elle produire de nouvelles normes? Intervention lors du colloque sur l’intelligence artificielle qui a eu lieu à l’Ecole polytechnique (Palaiseau) en septembre 2021 (en vidéo sur la chaîne Youtube de l’École polytechnique). 
  • Cardon, D., Cointet J.-P., Mazières A., 2018, La revanche des neurones. L’invention des machines inductives et la controverse de l’intelligence artificielle, Réseaux, 2018/5 (n° 211), p. 173-220. 
  • Ganascia, J. G., 2017, Le Mythe de la singularité, Paris, Seuil. 

Sources secondaires 

  • Belaval, Y., 1978, Leibniz critique de Descartes, Paris, Gallimard. 
  • Serres, M., 1968, Le Système de Leibniz, Paris, PUF. 
  • Couturat, L., 1961, La Logique de Leibniz, Hildesheim, Georg Olms Verlag. 
  • Hourya B. S., 1989, ‘Ars Inveniendi’ Aujourd’hui in Leibniz, Paris, PUF. 
  • Rabouin, D., 2018, Sur la mathesis universalis chez Leibniz, in Quaderns d’Historia de l’Enginyera, vol. 16. 
  • Laporte, J., 1950, Le rationalisme de Descartes, Paris, PUF. 
Lo Sguardo è un progetto full open access. Puoi scaricare gratuitamente tutto il nostro archivio, ma saremmo lieti di ricevere un piccolo contributo tramite PayPal.
Sostieni Lo Sguardo
Support Lo Sguardo
Lo Sguardo is a full open access project. You can download all the articles for free, but we will be glad to receive a little support through PayPal.
Lo Sguardo è un progetto full open access. Puoi scaricare gratuitamente tutto il nostro archivio, ma saremmo lieti di ricevere un piccolo contributo tramite PayPal.
Sostieni Lo Sguardo
Support Lo Sguardo
Lo Sguardo is a full open access project. You can download all the articles for free, but we will be glad to receive a little support through PayPal.
Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter
Lasciaci il tuo indirizzo email per rimanere aggiornato sulle nostre novità.