<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>38-01 &#8211; Lo Sguardo | Rivista di Filosofia Online</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/category/38/38-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.losguardo.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 11:54:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>«Nulla succurri providentia potest». Le critiche di Eloisa al concetto di provvidenza divina nella lettera IV dell’Epistolario con Abelardo</title>
		<link>https://www.losguardo.net/it/le-critiche-di-eloisa-al-concetto-di-provvidenza-divina-nella-lettera-iv-dellepistolario-con-abelardo/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lo Sguardo - Rivista di Filosofia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 22:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[#38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[38-01]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eloisa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pietro Abelardo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women Philosophers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.losguardo.net/?p=6064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CONTRIBUTI / 1 / Matteo Sperandini Nulla succurri providentia potest. ‘Eloise&#8217;s critique of the concept of divine providence in Letter iv of the Epistolary to Abelard In the conclusion of the Historia calamitatum mearum, Abelard asserts that every human misfortune is part of a divine design whose end is good. This observation lends itself well...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/le-critiche-di-eloisa-al-concetto-di-provvidenza-divina-nella-lettera-iv-dellepistolario-con-abelardo/">«Nulla succurri providentia potest». Le critiche di Eloisa al concetto di provvidenza divina nella lettera IV dell’Epistolario con Abelardo</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/homepage">Lo Sguardo | Rivista di Filosofia Online</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elisabetta di Boemia: variazioni antropotecniche sul dualismo cartesiano</title>
		<link>https://www.losguardo.net/it/elisabetta-di-boemia-variazioni-antropotecniche-sul-dualismo-cartesiano/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lo Sguardo - Rivista di Filosofia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[#38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[38-01]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elisabeth of Bohemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mind-Body Dualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[René Descartes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women Philosophers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.losguardo.net/?p=6062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CONTRIBUTI / 2 / Salvatore Grandone Elizabeth of Bohemia: Anthropotechnic Variations on Cartesian Dualism This paper offers an anthropotechnic reading of the correspondence between Descartes and Elizabeth of Bohemia. Elizabeth places the question of cartesian dualism in an «ascetic» perspective (in the etymological sense of the term): understanding how mind and body interact serves to...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/elisabetta-di-boemia-variazioni-antropotecniche-sul-dualismo-cartesiano/">Elisabetta di Boemia: variazioni antropotecniche sul dualismo cartesiano</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/homepage">Lo Sguardo | Rivista di Filosofia Online</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Philosophical and Sociable Critique in the Form of Public Letters. Margaret Cavendish and the Seventeenth-Century Intellectual Debates</title>
		<link>https://www.losguardo.net/it/a-philosophical-and-sociable-critique-in-the-form-of-public-letters/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lo Sguardo - Rivista di Filosofia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 22:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[#38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[38-01]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Cavendish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women Philosophers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.losguardo.net/?p=6059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CONTRIBUTI / 3 / Maria Giulia Sestito Although an increasing number of women have started to write and publish their works in the seventeenth century, patriarchal norms did not allow them to do so in all genres. It is now widely accepted that women wrote private and public letters to challenge their male contemporaries and...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/a-philosophical-and-sociable-critique-in-the-form-of-public-letters/">A Philosophical and Sociable Critique in the Form of Public Letters. Margaret Cavendish and the Seventeenth-Century Intellectual Debates</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/homepage">Lo Sguardo | Rivista di Filosofia Online</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Debate on Plastic Natures in the Correspondence between Masham and Leibniz. Epistolary Exchanges as an Intellectual Framework in the République des Lettres</title>
		<link>https://www.losguardo.net/it/the-debate-on-plastic-natures-in-the-correspondence-between-masham-and-leibniz/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lo Sguardo - Rivista di Filosofia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 22:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[#38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[38-01]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damaris Masham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women Philosophers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.losguardo.net/?p=6057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ARTICOLI / 1 / Emilio M. De Tommaso In the early years of the eighteenth century, Jean Le Clerc and Pierre Bayle engaged in a fervent dispute regarding Ralph Cudworth’s notion of plastic natures. This article examines how this debate indirectly prompted the beginning of the philosophical correspondence between Damaris Masham, Cudworth’s daughter, and Gottfried...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/the-debate-on-plastic-natures-in-the-correspondence-between-masham-and-leibniz/">The Debate on Plastic Natures in the Correspondence between Masham and Leibniz. Epistolary Exchanges as an Intellectual Framework in the République des Lettres</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.losguardo.net/it/homepage">Lo Sguardo | Rivista di Filosofia Online</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
